Once a manager has finalised the plan, the next big question hits hard: who will do what, and how? That is where organising skills come in. They turn ideas on paper into a working team with clear roles, defined authority, and a structure that actually delivers results. For anyone aspiring to manage a tourism business, a hotel, or a travel agency, mastering these skills is non-negotiable.
Table of Contents
- What organising skills really mean
- Job analysis: the starting point
- Why job analysis matters more in tourism
- Selecting and training the right people
- Building a structured training pipeline
- Defining authority and responsibility
- Delegation: the practical side of authority
- Span of control: how many people can one boss handle?
- Tall vs flat structures
- Adjusting structure to environmental and technological change
- Restructuring with care
- The integrated network view
What organising skills really mean
Organising is the management function that picks up where planning ends. It is the process of developing an organisational structure and allocating human resources to ensure the accomplishment of objectives. Think of planning as the blueprint and organising as the actual construction, where you assemble people, money, equipment, and authority in the right combinations.
The classic management thinker Chester Barnard described organising as the function by which a concern defines role positions, related jobs, and the coordination between authority and responsibility. In simpler words, organising answers three core questions: What needs to be done? Who will do it? And how will they coordinate with others?
For a tourism manager running a destination management company, this could mean deciding who handles ground logistics in Jaipur, who manages corporate clients in Mumbai, and who coordinates international tour packages from the head office. Without organising skills, even the best travel itinerary or hotel concept will collapse under operational chaos.
Job analysis: the starting point
Every well-organised team begins with a thorough understanding of each job. This is called job analysis, the systematic study of a role’s duties, responsibilities, and required competencies. It produces two outputs that drive everything else: a job description (what the role does) and a job specification (what the person needs to bring).
In the hospitality and tourism context, job analysis is especially critical because roles vary wildly. A front-desk receptionist, a tour escort, and an executive chef have completely different skill profiles. Effective recruitment in hospitality starts with a clear job description and person specification, drafting selection criteria, and matching candidate attributes to job demands. Skip this step and you end up hiring a “people person” for a backend accounts role, or a quiet introvert for a guest-facing concierge desk.
Why job analysis matters more in tourism
Studies of front-line tourism and hospitality jobs show that employers prize “soft skills” and personal characteristics over formal qualifications. An analysis of 5,000 job advertisements found that social skills and personal characteristics were the dominant requirements, with only about 26 per cent of organisations mentioning educational qualifications. For service-facing roles, this number drops further. So job analysis must capture the right “soft” attributes, not just technical credentials.
Selecting and training the right people
Once you know what you need, the next organising skill is choosing and developing the people who will do the work. This is where recruitment, selection, induction, and training come together as a single ongoing cycle.
Selection in tourism is a layered process. Beyond CVs and interviews, modern hospitality firms use structured behavioural interviews, psychometric tests, and assessment centres for management roles. According to research published by McKinsey, up to 80 per cent of employee turnover is caused by poor hiring decisions, which makes the selection process critical for cost control as well as service quality.
Training is the natural follow-up. A new tour guide may know the history of the Taj Mahal in detail but still need coaching on group handling, emergency response, or selling premium add-ons. As one foundational management text observes, to successfully leverage human resources, an organisation must hire the right people, train them, and then motivate and inspire them. Skip training and you waste even the best hires.
Building a structured training pipeline
Smart tourism organisations create a training pipeline that runs through the employee’s life cycle: orientation, on-the-job mentoring, refresher courses, and periodic upskilling. Job analysis feeds this pipeline by identifying skill gaps. If room attendants need to handle 14 rooms per shift but new hires only manage 9, the gap signals where training must focus.
Defining authority and responsibility
Hiring people is only half the battle. The next organising skill is defining who gets to make which decisions. Without clear authority lines, even competent teams freeze up when a problem hits.
Authority is the right to make decisions and direct others. Responsibility is the obligation to perform the assigned duty. Accountability is being answerable for the result. The three must be balanced: giving someone responsibility without authority is a setup for failure, while giving authority without accountability invites recklessness.
In a hotel, the Front Office Manager has the authority to upgrade a guest, comp a meal, or waive a late checkout fee within set limits. These limits are not random; they flow from a thoughtful organising decision about how much discretion each role should carry. Once departments are formed, the manager classifies powers and the extent of authority for each managerial position, an activity called hierarchy. This hierarchy makes day-to-day operations predictable.
Delegation: the practical side of authority
Strong organisers know that holding on to all decisions creates bottlenecks. Delegation is how authority gets pushed down to where the work happens. A regional manager of a travel chain who personally approves every refund will drown in paperwork. By delegating up to a fixed limit to branch managers, the regional manager frees up time for strategy while keeping ultimate accountability.
Span of control: how many people can one boss handle?
One of the most practical organising skills is choosing the right span of control, that is, the number of subordinates a single manager can supervise effectively. Get it wrong, and either employees feel neglected or managers burn out.
Span of control varies by context. A call centre might have wide spans where one manager oversees 50 to 100 callers performing identical tasks, while a non-profit with diverse roles may keep spans as narrow as five. In a tourism setting, a banquet manager might supervise 20 service staff during a wedding, but a tour operations head might directly manage only 5 destination specialists because each handles complex, varied assignments.
The classic rule is simple: the more similar the tasks performed by subordinates, the wider the span can be. When jobs are complex, ambiguous, or require constant judgement, the span must shrink so the manager can give each direct report meaningful attention.
Tall vs flat structures
Span of control directly shapes whether your organisation looks tall or flat. A narrow span produces a tall structure with many layers, more promotion opportunities, and tighter supervision. A wide span produces a flat structure with fewer managers, faster decisions, and more autonomy. Modern tourism start-ups, especially digital travel platforms, lean towards flatter structures because speed and adaptability beat tight control. Traditional five-star hotel chains, on the other hand, often retain taller structures because service standards demand close supervision.
Adjusting structure to environmental and technological change
Organising is not a one-time event. The environment keeps shifting, and a structure that worked last year may slow you down this year. Strong managers continuously adjust their organisation to match new realities.
Consider a tour operator that built its team around domestic leisure travel. When inbound corporate MICE business starts booming, the existing structure cannot serve it well. A new corporate sales unit must be carved out, with its own head, dedicated salespeople, and a tweaked authority matrix.
Technology drives the same kind of restructuring. The rise of online travel aggregators forced traditional travel agencies to redesign roles entirely. A general management framework notes that organising principles facilitate adaptation to market changes by ensuring an organisation can modify its structure and processes responsively. If a hotel front desk is replaced by self-service kiosks, the receptionist role evolves into a guest experience host, with very different training and reporting needs.
Restructuring with care
Restructuring sounds clinical but is deeply human. People lose familiar reporting relationships, fear job security, and resist change. Skilled organisers communicate the rationale, retrain affected staff, and phase the transition. The goal is to keep service standards intact while the structure shifts beneath everyone’s feet.
The integrated network view
Pulling all of these threads together, organising creates what management scholars call an integrated network of people and jobs. Each role connects to others through reporting lines, information flows, and shared goals. The structure is usually shown as an organisation chart, but the real value lies in the unseen coordination it enables.
When organising is done well, employees understand their boundaries, managers know what to expect, and the organisation moves with purpose rather than drama. When done poorly, the same business produces duplication, gaps, blame games, and missed deadlines. The difference is rarely about effort or intention. It is almost always about how thoughtfully the organising work was done.
What do you think? If you were redesigning the structure of a mid-sized travel company adapting to AI-powered itinerary tools, would you widen the span of control to flatten the hierarchy, or keep it narrow to preserve service quality? And how would you decide which existing roles need redefinition versus elimination?
References
- https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-tc3-management/chapter/planning-organizing-leading-and-controlling/
- https://www.managementstudyguide.com/organizing_function.htm
- https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-notes/19782251
- https://nscpolteksby.ac.id/ebook/files/Ebook/Hospitality/Personnel%20Management%20(2007)/6.%20Chapter%205%20-%20Recruitment%20and%20selection.pdf
- https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel/our-insights/how-to-ace-hospitality-recruitment
- https://fhsu.pressbooks.pub/management/chapter/organizing/
- https://www.masterclass.com/articles/span-of-control
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Span_of_control
- https://www.scribd.com/document/544251651/Chapter-3-Management-Function-Organizing-715481b42cff67883d2420863dddf291
Leave a Reply